Can an ATE policy be good security in a claim where there are allegations of dishonesty or fraud?

June 5, 2023

Matthew Amey of TheJudge recently wrote an article for Practical Law on the High Court’s judgment in Saxon Woods Investment Ltd v Francesco Costa and others [2023] EWHC 850 (Ch). He considers the questions the court will examine when deciding whether an after the event policy or an anti-avoidance endorsement can act as security in cases involving allegations of dishonesty or fraud.

To read the full article, click on this link

Reproduced from Practical Law with the permission of the publishers. For further information visit www.practicallaw.com.

document.addEventListener( 'wpcf7mailsent', function( event ) { console.log(event.detail); if(event.detail.contactFormId == '23457') { setTimeout(function() { jQuery('#wpcf7-f23457-p23453-o2 .wpcf7-response-output').html('Thank you. Please download Law firms 2024 here ') }, 500); } }, false );

Can an ATE policy be good security in a claim where there are allegations of dishonesty or fraud?

General Enquiries

Apply

Frequently searched